Calculations of spin fluctuation spectral functions α2F in high-temperature superconducting cuprates
Griffin Heier, Sergey Y. Savrasov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.134503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Spin fluctuations have been proposed as a key mechanism for mediating superconductivity, particularly in high-temperature superconducting cuprates, where conventional electron-phonon interactions alone cannot account for the observed critical temperatures. Traditionally, their role has been analyzed through tight-binding-based model Hamiltonians. In this work we present a method that combines density functional theory with a momentum- and frequency-dependent pairing interaction derived from the fluctuation exchange (FLEX) type random-phase approximation (FLEX-RPA) to compute Eliashberg spectral functions α2F(ω), which are central to the spin-fluctuation theory of superconductivity. We apply our numerical procedure to study a series of cuprates where our extracted material-specific α2F(ω) are found to exhibit remarkable similarities characterized by a sharp peak in the vicinity of 40–60 meV and their rapid decay at higher frequencies. Our exact diagonalization of a linearized BCS gap equation extracts superconducting energy-gap functions for realistic Fermi surfaces of the cuprates and predicts their symmetry to be dx2−y2 in all studied systems. Via a variation of onsite Coulomb repulsion U for the copper d electrons we show that the range of the experimental values of Tc can be reproduced in this approach but is extremely sensitive to the proximity of the spin-density wave instability. These data highlight challenges in building first-principle theories of high-temperature superconductivity but offer new insights beyond previous treatments, such as the confirmation of the usability of approximate BCS-like Tc equations, together with the evaluations of the material-specific coupling constant λ without reliance on tight-binding approximations of their electronic structures.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| HgBa2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CsV3Sb5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Weak-coupling model of spin fluctuations in the superconducting state of the layered cuprates
similarity 0.98N. Bulut & D. J. Scalapino
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological phase fluctuations, amplitude fluctuations, and criticality in extreme type-II superconductors
similarity 0.97A. K. Nguyen & A. Sudbø
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-phonon coupling and q-dependence of spin excitations and high-Tc superconductivity from band models
similarity 0.97T. Jarlborg
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unified description of cuprate superconductors using a four-band d−p model
similarity 0.97Hiroshi Watanabe et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effective Hamiltonian for cuprate superconductors derived from multiscale ab initio scheme with level renormalization
similarity 0.97Motoaki Hirayama et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
s-Wave Superconductivity from an Antiferromagnetic Spin-Fluctuation Model for Bilayer Materials
similarity 0.97A. I. Liechtenstein et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified