Far-infrared absorption of thin superconducting aluminum films in the pair-breaking and paramagnetic limits
P. J. M. van Bentum, P. Wyder
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.1582 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Measurements are presented of the far-infrared absorption of thin superconducting aluminum films in a parallel magnetic field. The results for moderately thick films (d≊10 nm) are in reasonable agreement with the Abrikosov-Gor’kov theory of pair breaking. The experimental results for ultrathin films (d≤5 nm) in the paramagnetic limit show that the spectroscopic gap Ωg shifts linearly with the magnetic field H, according to ħΩg=2Δ-2μ0μBH. This shift of the gap is attributed to a photon-absorption process, where the quasiparticle spin is flipped with respect to the static field. The complex conductivity of a paramagnetically limited film in a parallel magnetic field is calculated, both within the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer framework and using the more general Green’s-function formalism with the inclusion of spin-orbit and (magnetic) spin-flip scattering. For the ultrathin Al films we obtain a good quantitative agreement between theory and experiment, assuming a spin-orbit coupling ħ/τSOΔ≊0.1 and a reduced value of the imaginary part of the conductivity, probably due to strong electron-phonon coupling effects.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.21 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.51 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.03 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.52 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.41 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.96 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Observation of phase fluctuations and electron-electron scattering in weakly disordered superconducting aluminum films
similarity 0.94Soon-Gul Lee & Thomas R. Lemberger
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of Propagating Plasma Modes in a Thin Superconducting Film
similarity 0.93O. Buisson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging phase slip dynamics in micron-size superconducting rings
similarity 0.93Hryhoriy Polshyn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electric-field tuning of the superconductor-insulator transition in granular Al films
similarity 0.93Wenhao Wu & P. W. Adams
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi-liquid effects in the gapless state of marginally thin superconducting films
similarity 0.93G. Catelani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron inelastic scattering in aluminum films and wires at temperatures near the superconducting transition
similarity 0.93James M. Gordon & A. M. Goldman
Source status unknown — claims are unverified