Theory of in situ measurement of wave-vector-dependent dynamic susceptibility and ESR spectroscopy using the ac Josephson effect
S. E. Barnes, F. Mehran
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.4537 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The elementary theory of in situ measurements of the wave-vector-dependent dynamic susceptibility χ(q,ω) in superconductor-insulator-superconductor (SIS) and superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor (SNS) Josephson junctions is presented in some detail. The theory for more complicated SISN and SINS junctions is also described. In addition, the theory of point-contact and superconducting quantum interference device geometries, relevant to the recent experiments of Baberschke, Bures, and Barnes is developed. Involved is a detailed application of the Maxwell and London equations along with the distributed Josephson effect. In a measurement of χ(q,ω), the frequency ω is determined by the relation 2eV0=ħω where V0 is the voltage applied across the junction, and the wave vector q is determined by the relation 2edB0=ħq where d is the effective width of the junction and B0 is the magnetic field applied perpendicular to the direction of the current. The relative merits of the different types of junctions are discussed and the expected signal strengths are estimated. The limitations for the maximum measurable frequency and wave vector are also given. It seems probable that the proposed technique can be used to measure spin-wave branches from zero wave vector up to about 10% of the way to the Brillouin zone edge. The electron-spin resonance (ESR) of dilute magnetic systems can be measured as in the experiments of Baberschke, Bures, and Barnes. Estimates and experiment suggest that this method of performing ESR is better than an order of magnitude more sensitive than conventional methods. Some applications are discussed.
Similar papers
Josephson current through a superconductor/semiconductor-nanowire/superconductor junction: Effects of strong spin-orbit coupling and Zeeman splitting
similarity 0.86Meng Cheng & Roman M. Lutchyn
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Spin Current in Triplet Superconductor Junctions
similarity 0.86Yasuhiro Asano · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610029
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetointerferometry of multiterminal Josephson junctions
similarity 0.86Régis Mélin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ferromagnetic resonance with a magnetic Josephson junction
similarity 0.86S. E. Barnes et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1010.3858
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupled Superconducting Phase and Ferromagnetic Order Parameter Dynamics
similarity 0.86I. Petkovic et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0904.1780
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling Spectroscopy of Two-level Systems Inside Josephson Junction
similarity 0.85I. Martin et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0502436
Source status unknown — claims are unverified