← Back to search

Precautions when interpreting EPR and dc magnetization measurements of high-Tc RBa2Cu3O9−x-phase superconducting materials

D. C. Vier, S. B. Oseroff, C. T. Salling, J. F. Smyth, S. Schultz, Y. Dalichaouch, B. W. Lee, M. B. Maple, Z. Fisk, J. D. Thompson

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.8888 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Many electron-paramagnetic-resonance (EPR) and magnetic susceptibility measurements for the high-Tc superconductors of the form RBa2Cu3O9−x (R=Y or a rare earth) have been reported. Excluding local moment resonances due solely to the R atoms, we show that all of the EPR measurements known to us are not intrinsic to the superconducting phase, but rather are due to low concentrations of spurious phases typically present in the samples. BaCuO2 is found to be the main source of the low-temperature EPR signal and of the magnetic susceptibility which has been reported for YBa2Cu3O9−x above Tc.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
RBa2Cu3O9-x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedonset
YBa2Cu3O9-x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedonset
EuBa2Cu3O9-x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers