Quantum kinetics of a superconducting tunnel junction: Theory and comparison with experiment
Kenneth S. Chow, Dana A. Browne, Vinay Ambegaokar
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.1624 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We develop a kinetic theory for the real-time response of a quantum particle interacting with a macroscopic reservoir. We discuss the equilibrium and long-time behavior of the solution of the kinetic equation for such a system. In the limit of low damping, the kinetic equation reduces to a master equation. Using the theory to model a Josephson junction loaded with an external impedance, we make contact with the experiments of Clark, Devoret, Esteve, and Martinis. We argue that a stationary solution of the master equation sufficiently describes the experiments, and make detailed comparison with data.
Similar papers
Controlled dephasing of Andreev states in superconducting quantum point contacts
similarity 0.88M. A. Despósito & A. Levy Yeyati
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson plasmon versus amplitude modes in a superconducting tunnel junction
similarity 0.88S. E. Shafranjuk & J. B. Ketterson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resonant enhancement of macroscopic quantum tunneling in Josephson junctions: Influence of coherent two-level systems
similarity 0.88M. V. Fistul
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum decay of the supercurrent and intrinsic capacitance of Josephson junctions beyond the tunnel limit
similarity 0.87Daniil S. Antonenko & Mikhail A. Skvortsov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of low-frequency noise on macroscopic quantum tunneling in superconducting circuits
similarity 0.87Mathias Duckheim & Joachim Ankerhold
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling in “Small” Josephson Junctions in a Magnetic Field
similarity 0.87Yu. N. Ovchinnikov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified