← Back to search

Comparative optical reflectance study of the superconducting KHg-graphite and CsBix-graphite intercalation compounds

M. H. Yang, P. A. Charron, R. E. Heinz, P. C. Eklund

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.1711 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the results of a comparative optical reflectance study at room temperature of the stage-1 and stage-2 CsBix and KHg graphite intercalation compounds (GIC’s) in the energy range 0.2–10 eV. A Kramers-Kronig analysis is carried out to determine the dielectric function ε(ω)=ε1(ω)+ε2(ω) and the intra- and interband contributions to ε(ω) are identified. The dielectric function for the respective compounds are analyzed in terms of a schematic density-of-states model involving contributions from two-dimensional graphite π band(s) and intercalate bands. Separate contributions from the π and intercalate electrons to the free-carrier plasma frequency are determined via the identification of the carbon π→π* interband absorption threshold ET∼2EF, where EF is the Fermi energy measured with respect to the approximate mirror plane in the carbon π-band structure. The analysis of the optical data indicates that for CsBix GIC’s, the electrical transport properties should be dominated by the light carbon π-band electrons in contrast to the KHg GIC’s, where the analysis indicates the transport properties should strongly depend on free carriers in both the π* and the intercalate band(s). In the case of KHg GIC’s, our interpretation of the experimental results are consistent with significant occupation of electronic states with Hg(6s) character. Our results suggest that nature of the superconductivity in the KHg and CsBix GIC’s should be quite different.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CsBi0.5C4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4Pressure not reportedunknown
CsBi1.0C4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.4Pressure not reportedunknown
CsBix

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.8Pressure not reportedunknown
KHgC4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.73Pressure not reportedunknown
KHgC8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.96Pressure not reportedunknown
CsBix

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers