← Back to search

Magnetism in the heavy-electron superconductors UPt3 and URu2Si2

M. R. Norman, T. Oguchi, A. J. Freeman

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.11193 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The nature of magnetism in the heavy-electron superconductors UPt3 and URu2Si2 is investigated by using a spin-orbit generalized variant of local-spin-density (LSD) theory to calculate the self-consistent moment-polarized electronic structure and the dynamic (bare-band) susceptibility. It is shown that the direction of the magnetic moment is predicted correctly. The size of the moment, however, is 0.8μB in UPt3 and 1.2μB in URu2Si2, i.e., a factor of 40 larger than experiment. It is noted, however, that the experimental moment of (0.65±0.1)μB for Th- or Pd-doped UPt3 is close to the theoretical value. The static susceptibility, χ(q), is predicted to be weakly dependent on q except for UPt3, where a peak is found at q=(π/c)(0,0,2)—in general agreement with neutron-scattering data at high frequencies. The low-frequency anomalies in the neutron data which lead to magnetic ordering are not seen in the calculated dynamic susceptibility, but can be understood in terms of a moment-moment interaction. An explanation for these conflicting data is offered based on the interaction of itinerant quasiparticle and local-moment degrees of freedom at low temperatures, which leads to a renormalization of the LSD spin-spin response function.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
UPt3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
URu2Si2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers