← Back to search

Magnetic field dependence of the resistivity and susceptibility of the above-100-K Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu superconductor

S. S. P. Parkin, E. M. Engler, V. Y. Lee, A. I. Nazzal, Y. Tokura, J. B. Torrance, P. M. Grant

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.7101 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The magnetic field dependence of the resistivity and susceptibility of multiphase Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O compounds exhibiting transport and diamagnetic anomalies at ≃115 and ≃75 K are reported. The field dependence of the latter yields values of Hc1 and dHc2dT(T=Tc) very similar to those found for the Y(R)Ba2Cu3O7−x family of Cu perovskitelike superconductors. The field dependence of the above-100-K region strongly suggests that bulk superconductivity, as opposed to filamentary or fluctuation behavior, dominates at these temperatures.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi1.7Sr1.3Ca2Cu3Ox

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

115Pressure not reportedonset
Bi1.7Sr1.3Ca2Cu3Ox

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

75Pressure not reportedmidpoint
Bi1.7Sr1.3Ca2Cu3Ox

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

115Pressure not reportedonset
Bi1.7Sr1.3Ca2Cu3Ox

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

74Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr2Cu2O7+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

22Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers