← Back to search

Structure of an isolated vortex in an anisotropic type-II superconductor

R. A. Klemm

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.117 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The Ginzburg-Landau equations with general effective-mass anisotropy are diagonalized for a general direction v of an isolated vortex core. For v not parallel to one of the three crystal axis directions, the local magnetic induction b contains components bρ and bφ, perpendicular to v, which vanish as ρ2 away from the center of the core with coefficients that are odd in the azimuthal angle φ. In the London limit far from the core, bρ and bφ are comparable to b3=v^⋅b, and all fall off exponentially in ρ, with two distinct exponents, each of which depends explicitly upon the azimuthal angle φ about v^. The presence of bρ and bφ reduces the energy cost of the locking of the core into the lattice but does not remove it entirely, as the leading correction to the line energy is proportional to the parameter β2 (rather than β), where β is the parameter introduced previously by the author. With the use of an ansatz, an exact form for the field components and reduced order parameter f in the core region is obtained. The lines of constant b3 and ‖b⊥‖ in the core region are found for arbitrary effective-mass anisotropy and v^. These forms should be observable by scanning tunneling microscopy and by large-momentum-transfer neutron-scattering experiments for fields slightly greater than Hc1. In addition, the angular dependence of Hc1 should exhibit a kink, as the vortex cores prefer to lie along one of the crystal symmetry directions.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers