Positron-annihilation momentum density in superconductors
R. Benedek, H.-B. Schüttler
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1789 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The origin of the dramatic shifts observed in the temperature dependence of positron-annihilation characteristics (particularly lifetime and Doppler-broadening line shape) near Tc in the cuprates is not presently clear. Both intrinsic and extrinsic (i.e., defect-related) mechanisms have been proposed. To help clarify whether Cooper pairing is responsible for these shifts, we present an approximate formulation of the positron characteristics in a BCS superconductor. Relations are derived for the zeroth- and first-order terms in the ladder summation for the two-photon momentum density, with electron propagators represented in the Nambu-Gorkov form. The momentum densities in the normal and superconducting states differ appreciably only within the pairing shell centered at pF. Numerical calculations are performed for two- and three-dimensional models. The differences increase with increasing Δ/μ but are relatively small in the first-order calculation. We also estimate an upper bound to the effect of BCS pairing on the positron characteristics, including terms to all orders in the electron-positron interaction. Based on comparisons of our model calculations with experiment, it seems unlikely that BCS pairing is responsible for the measured shifts in positron properties near Tc.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tl2Ba2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Influence of hole doping on spin dynamics in lightly doped copper oxide superconductors
similarity 0.95F. P. Onufrieva et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex and fluxon phase transitions in layered superconductors
similarity 0.95Baruch Horovitz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux noise in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.94Carsten Timm
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Zero-energy states in s-wave/normal-metal/d-wave superconductor junctions
similarity 0.94R. Žikić et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of the magnetic penetration depth with measurements of the vortex-penetration field for type-II superconductors
similarity 0.94G. P. Mikitik & Yu. V. Sharlai
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlation length in cuprate superconductors deduced from impurity-induced magnetization
similarity 0.94S. Ouazi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified