Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Metal-insulator transition in random superconducting networks’ ’’
C. M. Soukoulis, Qiming Li, Gary S. Grest
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.8668 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We address the remarks of Domriaanguez, López, and Simonin [Phys. Rev. B 42, 8665 (1990); preceding paper] on the determination of the normal-to-superconducting (N-S) phase boundary in random superconducting networks. We refute their claims that the disappearance of the fine structure of the N-S boundary and the change of the critical exponent k for the slope of the critical field on (p-pc) are due to the introduction of very weak links between nodes in the superconducting networks.
Similar papers
Comment on ‘‘Metal-insulator transition in random superconducting networks’’
similarity 0.92D. Domnguez et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metal-insulator transition in random superconducting networks
similarity 0.88C. M. Soukoulis et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Crossover exponents in percolating superconductor–nonlinear-conductor mixtures”
similarity 0.84Lei Gao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonuniversal Metallic Behavior of Superconducting Wires
similarity 0.84Scot R. Renn & Ji-Min Duan
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
True superconductivity in a two-dimensional superconducting-insulating system
similarity 0.83Nadya Mason & Aharon Kapitulnik
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘‘Crossover to effectively two-dimensional vortices for high-Tc superconductors’’
similarity 0.83H.-Q. Ding
Source status unknown — claims are unverified