← Back to search

Mössbauer observation near the superconducting transition temperature in the TlBaCa3Cu3O8.5 superconductor

Zeng Yiwei, Yan Xiaohua, Lin Minzhu, Meng Xianren, Cao Huixian, Wu Xiaoshan, Tu Qingyun, Lin Zhenjin

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.867 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The TlBaCa3Cu3O8.5 superconductor contains two main superconducting phases, 1:2:2:3 and 2:2:2:3, identified by powder x-ray analysis. Using Fe57 Mössbauer nuclei as the probe, it has been confirmed that the results are the same as those furnished by x-ray analysis. It has also been proved that iron atoms in the lattice substitute two inequivalent sites of copper atoms for each main phase. We have observed a temperature dependence of the Mössbauer parameters, i.e., quadrupole splitting, isomer shift, and relative resonance area. Here several problems are discussed related to the lattice dynamics and the electric charge transfer, which takes place in the transition from normal state to superconducting state.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
TlBaCa3Cu2.93Fe0.07O8.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

110Pressure not reportedonset
TlBaCa3Cu2.93Fe0.07O8.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

100Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
TlBaCa3Cu3O8.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

123Pressure not reportedonset
TlBaCa3Cu3O8.5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

116Pressure not reportedzero_resistance

Similar papers