← Back to search

Raman study of oxygen in the oxide superconductor Bi2CaSr2Cu2O8+δ

Y. H. Shi, M. J. G. Lee, M. Moskovits, R. Carpick, A. Hsu, B. W. Statt, Z. Wang

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.370 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The zero-resistance temperature of the high-Tc oxide superconductor Bi2CaSr2Cu2O8+δ (2:1:2:2) can be significantly increased by annealing at 500 °C in an oxygen-reduced environment. Raman spectroscopy of high-density sintered samples shows that processing the material in this way increases the strength of the Raman peak of highest frequency (650 cm−1), leaving the strengths of the other oxygen peaks unchanged. The Raman data confirm that the mobile oxygen atoms are located in the bismuth layer and support those models of oxygen structure in which excess oxygen is incorporated interstitially. They provide evidence that the incommensurate-to-commensurate transition observed in electron diffraction in the vicinity of 500 °C is associated with a loss of oxygen from the bismuth layer.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2CaSr2Cu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

84Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2Sr2CuO6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2CaSr2Cu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

94Pressure not reportedzero_resistance
Bi2CaSr2Cu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

94Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers