Intralayer versus interlayer pairing in the copper oxide superconductors: The three- and four-layer problems
S. H. Liu, R. A. Klemm
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.415 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have analyzed the possible superconducting states of a model layered superconductor with N conducting layers in a unit cell, for N=3 and 4, in the presence of both intralayer and interlayer pairing interactions. In case all layers are identical, the system has the same behavior as one-layer and two-layer systems, namely that pure intralayer pairing interaction stabilizes an s-wave state with equal and isotropic gaps in all N quasiparticle bands, while interlayer pairing produces both singlet and triplet paired states with anisotropic gap functions. The singlet state is always energetically more stable than the triplet state. The analysis can be easily extended to nonidentical layers. As one example, a model for YBa2Cu3O7−δ consisting of two CuO2 layers in a unit cell separated by a layer of CuO chains is discussed. It is shown that the system reduces to an effective two-layer model, due to the large difference in electronic energy states between the planes and the chains. The chains are most likely nonsuperconducting. In another example, we show that Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 can be reduced to an effective three-layer system. Recent tunneling data can be understood on the basis of this model.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Intra- versus interlayer pairing in copper oxide superconductors: Response to a magnetic field
similarity 0.99S. H. Liu & R. A. Klemm
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing symmetry and long-range pair potential in a weak-coupling theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.97Haranath Ghosh
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Model for layered superconductors: From Josephson coupling to three-dimensional behavior
similarity 0.97Denis Feinberg et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoupling and depinning of flux lattices in disordered layered superconductors
similarity 0.97Baruch Horovitz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local modulations of the spin-fluctuation-mediated pairing interaction by impurities in d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.97A. T. Rømer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oxygen hole symmetry and banding in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.97L. F. Mattheiss & D. R. Hamann
Source status unknown — claims are unverified