Andreev scattering, Josephson currents, and coupling energy in clean superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor junctions
U. Schüssler, R. Kümmel
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.2754 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor junctions with superconducting Nb banks coupled by the degenerate III-V semiconductor n-type InAs are described by the Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations (BdGE) with spatially and energy-dependent effective masses, abruptly changing conduction-band edges, interface barriers, and vanishing pair potential in the semiconducting (Sm) layer. Phase coherence between the superconducting (S) banks is mediated by Andreev scattering of ballistic quasiparticles, which is the only mechanism considered for Cooper pair transfer. The bound-state subbands, broadened by scattering from the mismatches at the S-Sm interfaces, split off at finite phase differences Φ between the pair potentials in either S region. At arbitrary temperatures T below the critical temperature Tc of Nb, the Josephson-current density j(Φ), computed numerically from the solutions of the BdGE, can be simulated very well by j(Φ)=jcsin[Φ-Lkinj(Φ)], where the kinetic-inductance parameter Lkin decreases with increasing temperature and decreasing Sm layer thickness 2a. The maximum coupling energy per unit area is EJ(Φ=π)=jcħ/e for all Lkin. The critical Josephson-current density jc is 5.6×105 A cm−2 at T=0 K, n=1019 cm−3, 2a=0.3 μm, and vanishing interface barrier strength Z. jc decreases with increasing 2a, T, and Z; the decrease with temperature becomes more and more pronounced as the electron concentration n in the Sm layer decreases; the decrease with Z can be understood by the Z dependence of the Andreev scattering probability. The Josephson currents computed from Andreev scattering are so large that they should destroy any pair potential possibly induced in the Sm layer by the proximity effect.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic barriers for digital superconducting electronics: A review
similarity 0.96A. Mitrovic & M. Bocko
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Low-Temperature Enhancement of Supercurrent in Topological-Insulator Nanoribbon Josephson Junctions: Evidence for Low-Energy Andreev Bound States
similarity 0.93Morteza Kayyalha et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron holography observation of vortex lattices in a superconductor
similarity 0.93J. E. Bonevich et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin Uncoupling in Free Nb Clusters: Support for Nascent Superconductivity
similarity 0.93Ramiro Moro et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of multiple Andreev reflections in superconducting tunnel junctions
similarity 0.93A. W. Kleinsasser et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analysis and active compensation of microphonics in continuous wave narrow-bandwidth superconducting cavities
similarity 0.93A. Neumann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified