Tilt-wave instability of the flux-line lattice in anisotropic superconductors
Edson Sardella, M. A. Moore
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.9664 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The stability of the Abrikosov flux-line lattice for uniaxially anisotropic superconductors has been studied in the London approximation as a function of the anisotropic mass ratio and the angle θ between the B field and crystal c axis. For anisotropic mass ratio Mc/Mab larger than (3+ √8 ) and for a range of angles θc1<θ<θc2, the straight flux lines become unstable and a tilt-wave instability occurs, irrespective of the magnitude of the B field. We show that this instability occurs for a variety of cutoff schemes (which are needed to make London theory finite). The instability is probably related to the formation of a ‘‘combined’’ lattice of flux lines in which two species of vortices coexist simultaneously but run in different directions.
Similar papers
Vortices in layered superconductors with Josephson coupling
similarity 0.88L. N. Bulaevskii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental Evidence for a Transverse Magnetization of the Abrikosov Lattice in Anisotropic Superconductors
similarity 0.88D. E. Farrell et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dendritic instability of the magnetic flux in thermally anisotropic type-II superconductors
similarity 0.87E. E. Dvash et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex patterns in mesoscopic superconducting ellipses and strips
similarity 0.87C. Meyers & M. Daumens
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stability of driven Josephson vortex lattice in layered superconductors revisited
similarity 0.87S. N. Artemenko & S. V. Remizov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface instabilities and vortex transport in current-carrying superconductors
similarity 0.87I. Aranson & V. Vinokur
Source status unknown — claims are unverified