Gravitomagnetism and magnetic permeability in superconductors
Mark Kowitt
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.704 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Li and Torr [Phys. Rev. B 46, 5489 (1992)] have developed theoretical models to estimate the magnitude of gravitomagnetic effects in superconductors. The magnitude deduced, however, is grossly overestimated, because the authors have misinterpreted the meaning of the magnetic permeability, μ, as it is commonly used by experimentalists describing the Meissner effect in bulk superconducting samples. The authors have also proposed flawed models of the microscopic dynamics of superconductors to support their error. Ambiguity in the common usage of the magnetization field (M), magnetic susceptibility (χ), and permeability (μ), to describe the macroscopic and microscopic behavior of superconductors is partly to blame; a simple heuristic model is presented here to clarify the meaning of these terms.
Similar papers
Gravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors
similarity 0.88Ning Li & D. G. Torr
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of a gravitomagnetic field on pure superconductors
similarity 0.85N. Li & D. G. Torr
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interaction of Gravitational Waves with Superconductors
similarity 0.83NA Inan et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2207.08062
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interaction between superconductors and weak gravitational field
similarity 0.83Antonio Gallerati · 2021 · arXiv:2101.00418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Penetration depth of a superconducting superlattice
similarity 0.82J. Guimpel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor Meissner effects for gravito-electromagnetic fields in harmonic coordinates due to non-relativistic gravitational sources
similarity 0.82Nader Inan · 2022 · arXiv:2201.12969
Source status unknown — claims are unverified