← Back to search

Superconducting phases of La2CuO4+δ prepared by electrochemical oxidation at ambient temperature

H. H. Feng, Z. G. Li, P. H. Hor, S. Bhavaraju, J. F. DiCarlo, A. J. Jacobson

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.16499 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Superconducting phases in La2CuO4+δ prepared at ambient temperature by electrochemical oxidation have been investigated for the nominal composition range 0<δ<0.1. Consistent with previous reports, a stable superconducting phase with Tc∼32–34 K is observed for δ≤0.05. In contrast, samples with δ≳0.05 are found to be unstable either at room temperature or upon annealing between 25 °C and 110 °C. All phases with Tc higher than 34 K, such as Tc∼45 K phase, are metastable and only accessible under highly nonequilibrium intercalation conditions. A phase with Tc=15 K is also observed at a nominal hole concentration of p∼0.125, indicating that all of the observed Tc depressions in the cation substituted La2−x(Sr,Ba)xCuO4 and anion doped La2CuO4+δ at p∼0.125 are electronically driven and are of a common origin.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

32Pressure unresolvedonset
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

45Pressure unresolvedonset
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure unresolvedonset
La2-x(Sr,Ba)xCuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers