Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model
J. Beenen, D. M. Edwards
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.13636 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quasiparticle bands of the two-dimensional Hubbard model are calculated using the Roth two-pole approximation to the one-particle Green’s function. Excellent agreement is obtained with recent Monte Carlo calculations, including an anomalous volume of the Fermi surface near half-filling, which can possibly be explained in terms of a breakdown of Fermi liquid theory. The calculated bands are very flat around the (π,0) points of the Brillouin zone in agreement with photoemission measurements of cuprate superconductors. With doping there is a shift in spectral weight from the upper band to the lower band. The Roth method is extended to deal with superconductivity within a four-pole approximation allowing electron-hole mixing. It is shown that triplet p-wave pairing never occurs. A self-consistent solution with singlet dx2−y2-wave pairing is found and optimal doping occurs when the van Hove singularity, corresponding to the flat band part, lies at the Fermi level. Nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic correlations play an important role in flattening the bands near the Fermi level and in favoring superconductivity. However, the mechanism for superconductivity is a local one, in contrast to spin-fluctuation exchange models. For reasonable values of the hopping parameter the transition temperature Tc is in the range 10–100 K. The optimum doping δc lies between 0.14 and 0.25, depending on the ratio U/t. The gap equation has a BCS-like form and 2Δmax/kTc≃4.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 85 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model: Gutzwiller wave function solution
similarity 0.98Jan Kaczmarczyk et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional t-t′-Hubbard model
similarity 0.98Andreas Eberlein & Walter Metzner
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of the superconductivity dome in the two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.98K.-S. Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in a Hubbard-Fröhlich model and in cuprates
similarity 0.98T. M. Hardy et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exact solution to a strongly coupled Hubbard model in one dimension for high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.98Jamil Tahir-Kheli & William A. Goddard, III
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase separation and d-wave superconductivity in a two-dimensional extended Hubbard model with nearest-neighbor attractive interaction
similarity 0.97W. P. Su
Source status unknown — claims are unverified