Superconducting order parameter symmetry in multilayer cuprates
J. Maly, D. Z. Liu, K. Levin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.6786 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We classify the allowed order parameter symmetries in multilayer cuprates and discuss their physical consequences, with emphasis on Josephson tunneling and impurity scattering. Our solutions to the gap equation are based on highly nonspecific forms for the inter- and intraplane pairing interactions in order to arrive at the most general conclusions. Within this framework, the bilayer (N=2) case is discussed in detail with reference to Y-Ba-Cu-O (YBCO) and Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O (BSCCO) and the related Landau-Ginzburg free energy functional. Particular attention is paid to the role of small orthorhombic distortions as would derive from the chains in YBCO and from superlattice effects in BSCCO, which give rise to a rich and complex behavior of the multilayer order parameter. This order parameter has N components associated with each of the N bands or layers. Moreover, these components have specific phase relationships. In the orthorhombic bilayer case the (s,-s) state is of special interest, since for a wide range of phase space, this state exhibits π phase shifts in corner Josephson junction experiments. In addition, its transition temperature is found to be insensitive to nonmagnetic interplane disorder, as would be present at the rare earth site in YBCO, for example. Of particular interest, also, are the role of van Hove singularities which are seen to stabilize states with dx2−y2-like symmetry (as well as nodeless s states) and to elongate the gap functions along the four van Hove points, thereby leading to a substantial region of gaplessness. We find that for these rather general models of the pairing interaction the dx2−y2-like states are the most stable solutions in a large region of parameter space. In this way, they should not be specifically associated with a spin fluctuation driven pairing mechanism. © 1996 The American Physical Society.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Critical fluctuation conductivity in layered superconductors in a strong electric field
similarity 0.97I. Puica & W. Lang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Momentum Dependence of the Superconducting Gap in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8
similarity 0.95H. Ding et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Instability of a tilted vortex line in magnetically coupled layered superconductors
similarity 0.95M. Benkraouda & John R. Clem
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Columnar defects and vortex fluctuations in layered superconductors
similarity 0.95A. E. Koshelev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic order and superconductivity in Bi2Sr2Ca1−xYxCu2O8
similarity 0.95I. Nowik et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex dynamics and states of artificially layered superconducting films with correlated defects
similarity 0.95Andreas Engel & H. J. Trodahl
Source status unknown — claims are unverified