Interlayer coupling and the thermopower of cuprate superconductors
J.-S. Zhou, J. B. Goodenough
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.12488 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A review of the extant literature on the thermopower (TEP) of the cuprate superconductors reveals a transition from polaronic to homogeneous itinerant electron behavior with increasing hole concentration in the CuO2 sheets. Superconductivity appears at the compositions of crossover from one regime to the other, and the normal state of the superconductors retains a heterogeneous electronic structure of mobile hole-rich and hole-poor domains, which introduces both a statistical and a transport component to the Seebeck coefficient. A primary manifestation of the transport component is an enhancement term δα(T) having a maximum at a Tmax=100–140 K, which is characteristic of a strong coupling of the charge carriers to optical rather than acoustic phonons. Comparison of the TEP for La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 vs La0.85Sr1.15GaCuO5 and La1.8Sr0.2CaCu2O6+δ vs Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ indicates that an increase in the c-axis coupling between neighboring CuO2 sheets increases the size of the polaron or hole-rich domains in the underdoped compositions, thereby lowering the room-temperature value of the Seebeck coefficient α(300 K) and increasing the magnitude of δα(T). These observations implicate a strong elastic component, enhanced by electron-lattice interactions, in the c-axis coupling as well as in the formation of larger nonadiabatic polarons and their interactions within the CuO2 planes. They also signal that caution must be exercised in any application of a ‘‘universal plot’’ of α(300 K) versus hole concentration p per Cu atom in a CuO2 plane to obtain a value of p from TEP data. © 1996 The American Physical Society.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.8Sr0.2CaCu2O6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Interplay between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in a multilayered system
similarity 0.97H. T. Quan & Jian-Xin Zhu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interlayer conductivity in the superconductor Tl2Ba2CuO6+δ: Energetics and energy scales
similarity 0.96A. S. Katz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic states and superconductivity in multilayer high-Tc cuprates
similarity 0.96M. Mori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Complementary Response of Static Spin-Stripe Order and Superconductivity to Nonmagnetic Impurities in Cuprates
similarity 0.96Z. Guguchia et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature Dependence of the Superconducting Gap in High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.96B. V. Fine
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting properties of [BaCuOx]2/[CaCuO2]n artificial structures with ultrathick CaCuO2 blocks
similarity 0.96G. Balestrino et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified