Contrasting dynamic spin susceptibility models and their relation to high-temperature superconductivity
H.-B. Schüttler, M. R. Norman
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.13295 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We compare the normal-state resistivities ρ and the critical temperatures Tc for superconducting dx2−y2 pairing due to antiferromagnetic (AF) spin fluctuation exchange in the context of two phenomenological dynamical spin susceptibility models for the cuprate high-Tc materials, one based on fits to NMR data on Y-Ba-Cu-O (YBCO) proposed by Millis, Monien, and Pines (MMP) and Monthoux and Pines (MP), and the other based on fits to neutron scattering data on YBCO proposed by Radtke, Ullah, Levin, and Norman (RULN). Assuming comparable electronic bandwidths and resistivities in both models, we show that the RULN model gives a much lower d-wave Tc (≲20 K) than the MMP model (with Tc∼100 K). We demonstrate that these profound differences in the Tc’s arise from fundamental differences in the spectral weight distributions of the two model susceptibilities at high (>100 meV) frequencies and are not primarily caused by differences in the calculational techniques employed by MP and RULN. Further neutron scattering experiments, to explore the spectral weight distribution at all wave vectors over a sufficiently large excitation energy range, will thus be of crucial importance to resolve the question whether AF spin fluctuation exchange can provide a viable mechanism to account for high-Tc superconductivity. Limitations of the Migdal-Eliashberg approach in such models will be discussed. © 1996 The American Physical Society.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 100 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Constraints on superconducting transition temperatures in the cuprates: Antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations
similarity 0.97R. J. Radtke et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hole superconductivity in oxides: A two-band model
similarity 0.97J. E. Hirsch & F. Marsiglio
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity-induced magnetic fields in unconventional superconductors
similarity 0.96C. H. Choi & Paul Muzikar
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-field scaling behavior of thermodynamic and transport quantities of YBa2Cu3O7−δ near the superconducting transition
similarity 0.96U. Welp et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frequency dependence of the local ac magnetic response in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.96R. Prozorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum oscillations in the mixed state of d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.96Ashot Melikyan & Oskar Vafek
Source status unknown — claims are unverified