Comment on 'Magnetic levitation force and penetration depth in type-II superconductors'
A. Badía
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.11875 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A new approach for examining the various superconducting pairing states was proposed by Xu, Miller, and Ting [Phys. Rev. B 51, 424 (1995)]. The method consists of investigating the levitation force measured by a magnetic force microscope tip above a superconducting sample. Nevertheless, the quantitative analysis of experimental results needs to take into account important geometrical effects. In this Comment I show that, related to several physical arguments, the geometrical coefficients given by the authors admit much more simple expressions, allowing straightforward calculations for practical purposes. Furthermore, the method is presented for extending their linear theory to higher-order approximations.
Similar papers
Magnetic levitation force and penetration depth in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.88J. H. Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic levitation force of semi-infinite type-II superconductors
similarity 0.87Mark W. Coffey
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Levitation force from high-Tc superconducting thin-film disks
similarity 0.85Anjali B. Riise et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic properties of finite superconducting cylinders. II. Nonuniform applied field and levitation force
similarity 0.85Carles Navau & Alvaro Sanchez
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic properties of finite superconducting cylinders. I. Uniform applied field
similarity 0.84Alvaro Sanchez & Carles Navau
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Calculation of levitation forces in permanent-superconductor systems
similarity 0.83M. J. Qin et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111316
Source status unknown — claims are unverified