Normal-state spin gap of Bi-based superconductors
Mao Zhiqiang, Xu Gaojie, Wang Ruiping, Wang Keqing, Tian Mingliang, Zhang Yuheng
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14581 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The thermoelectric power (TEP) S(T) and resistivity ρ(T) were measured for underdoped and overdoped Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2Can−1CunO2n+4+δ (n=1,2) samples with different oxygen contents. A specific heat measurement was also conducted for the n=2 system. We found that S(T) exhibited a significant enhancement below a characteristic temperature Tg for these samples, as observed in underdoped samples of YBa2Cu3O7−δ and YBa2Cu4O8. Such an anomaly in S(T) below Tg suggests that an energy gap exists in the normal states of underdoped and overdoped Bi-based superconductors (n=1 or 2). The normal-state gap temperature (Tg) increases with decreasing oxygen content in both n=1 and 2 systems. A downturn behavior in ρ(T) with the opening of a normal-state gap was also observed for some overdoped samples. On the other hand, the experimental data also showed that S(T) had a positive slope at high temperatures for the heavily overdoped samples of the n=1 system, while all the overdoped samples of the n=2 system had a negative slope in S(T) within the whole measured temperature range. This suggests that the Bi2O2 layers are metallic and make a contribution to the TEP in the heavily overdoped region of the n=1 system, but are insulating in the whole overdoped region of the n=2 system. In addition, specific heat measurements for the n=2 system reveal that a decrease in oxygen content results in the occurrence of phase segregation.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CuO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CuO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 67 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 78 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 81 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 64 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 90 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 60 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 58 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi1.8Pb0.2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 87 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu4O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tl2Ba2CuO6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting energy gap in MBa2Cu3O7−δ-type materials
similarity 0.96A. Wittlin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting energy gap versus pseudogap in hole-doped cuprates as revealed by infrared spectroscopy
similarity 0.96T. Dong et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature Dependence of the Superconducting Gap in High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.96B. V. Fine
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic theory of weak pseudogap behavior in the underdoped cuprate superconductors: General theory and quasiparticle properties
similarity 0.95Jörg Schmalian et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measurement of the energy gap in oxygen-annealed Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ high-Tc superconductors by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.95Zhe Zhang & Charles M. Lieber
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intrinsic and structural isotope effects in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.95R. Khasanov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified