Flux-flow drag in coupled Josephson junctions
R. D. Parmentier, P. Barbara, G. Costabile, A. D'Anna, B. A. Malomed, C. Soriano
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.15165 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a detailed analysis of the interaction between two fluxon chains in parallel magnetically coupled long Josephson junctions, one of which is biased (``generator'') while another is unbiased (``detector''). The main effect is that the driven fluxon chain in the generator may drag the chain in the detector. We note that five different regimes of the interaction are possible: both chains may be pinned by the external magnetic field; both may move in a locked state, inducing the same dc voltage in both junctions; in an unlocked state they may move at different velocities; the chain in the detector may remain pinned while the one in the generator is moving; and, finally, in a limited range of parameters the mean detector voltage may be negative, which implies that the detector chain is moving in the direction opposite to that of the chain in the generator. We consider a simplified model based on the assumptions that the fluxon chains are dense and rigid, and that their motion is nonrelativistic. In this model, each chain is represented by a single degree of freedom (its coordinate). Numerical and analytical consideration of the simplified model demonstrates that it is able to reproduce correctly all the dynamical regimes except for the negative-voltage one. To explain the existence of the latter regime, we introduce another model, suggested by the simulations, which is based on the presence of two fluxons and one antifluxon in the generator, and a single fluxon in the detector. The negative voltage is produced by motion of the antifluxon in a bound state with the detector's fluxon. The existence region of this state is limited by its collisions with free fluxons in the generator.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamical evidence of critical fields in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.96M. Cirillo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spatially resolved study of the dynamics of Josephson tunnel junctions
similarity 0.96S. G. Lachenmann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Dynamics of Ferromagnetic Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.96I. Petković & M. Aprili
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of surface losses and the self-pumping effect on current-voltage characteristics of a long Josephson junction
similarity 0.95A. L. Pankratov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of noise and near-resonant perturbations on bifurcations in Josephson junctions
similarity 0.95H. Svensmark et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Annular Josephson tunnel junctions in an external magnetic field: The statics
similarity 0.95N. Martucciello & R. Monaco
Source status unknown — claims are unverified