Correlations between normal-state properties and superconductivity
J. E. Hirsch
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.9007 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Despite many years of intense theoretical effort it is still not possible to predict whether a material will be superconducting or not at low temperatures by measurement of its physical properties at higher temperatures. Nor is it possible in general to estimate the magnitude of the superconducting critical temperature Tc from measurements of normal-state properties. Here we address these questions from a statistical point of view. The metallic elements in the first six rows of the periodic table are assumed to be a ``representative sample'' drawn from a larger set of materials, and various statistical measures of correlations between the magnitude of Tc and a normal-state property, as well as between a normal-state property and the fact whether the material is or is not a superconductor, are considered. Thirteen normal-state physical properties are studied, some of which are believed to be important to determine superconducting properties within conventional BCS theory and others not. It is found that properties assumed to be important within BCS theory rank lowest in predictive power regarding whether a material is or is not a superconductor. Instead, properties with highest predictive power in this respect are found to be bulk modulus, work function and Hall coefficient. With respect to the magnitude of Tc, it is found to be positively correlated with electronic heat capacity, magnetic susceptibility, and atomic volume, and negatively correlated with electrical and thermal conductivity and Debye temperature. No significant correlations with ionic mass and ionization potential are found. Consequences of these findings for the theoretical understanding of superconductivity are discussed.
Similar papers
Superconductivity in the elements, alloys and simple compounds
similarity 0.90G. W. Webb et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.04724
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transition Temperatures of Superconductors estimated from Periodic Table Properties
similarity 0.89O. Paul Isikaku-Ironkwe · 2012 · arXiv:1204.0233
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of High-Tc Superconductivity: Transition Temperature
similarity 0.85Dale R. Harshman et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1202.0306
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Concerning the nature of high-Tc superconductivity: Survey of experimental properties and implications for interlayer coupling
similarity 0.85D. R. Harshman & A. P. Mills, Jr.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperature
similarity 0.85Valentin Stanev et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1709.02727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal Correlation between Critical Temperature of Superconductivity and band structure features
similarity 0.85Yang Liu et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.12171
Source status unknown — claims are unverified