← Back to search

Quasiparticle energy relaxation in the cuprate superconductors

S. G. Doettinger, S. Kittelberger, R. P. Huebener, C. C. Tsuei

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.14157 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

At high flux-flow velocities in the mixed state of a type-II superconductor the nonequilibrium distribution of the quasiparticles is shifted to higher energies. As shown theoretically by Larkin and Ovchinnikov, a distinct signature of this nonequilibrium effect is an electronic instability, resulting in a sharp kink in the current-voltage characteristic at a critical vortex velocity vφ*. From measurements of vφ* the quasiparticle-energy relaxation rate τɛ−1 can be found. We have measured this instability point for epitaxial c axis oriented films of La1.85Sr0.15CuO4−x and YBa2Cu3O7−δ. In both cuprates the observed temperature dependence of τɛ−1 could be well fitted with the function τɛ−1=aexp[−2Δ(T)/kBT], suggesting that the electron-electron recombination process, perhaps in combination with the emission of another excitation, is crucial. As an example of a low-Tc superconductor we have also studied amorphous Mo3Si films and found that τɛ−1 can be fitted by a function similar to that we have used for the cuprates, again indicating the importance of the electron-electron interaction.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.85Sr0.15CuO4-x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O7-δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Mo3Si

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.67Pressure not reportedzero_resistance

Similar papers