High-resolution photoemission study of metallic, insulating, and superconducting BEDT-TTF salts
A. Sekiyama, T. Susaki, A. Fujimori, T. Sasaki, N. Toyota, T. Kondo, G. Saito, M. Tsunekawa, T. Iwasaki, T. Muro, T. Matsushita, S. Suga, H. Ishii, T. Miyahara
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.9082 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have made a high-resolution photoemission study of quasi-two-dimensional organic conductors BEDT-TTF salts which have various ground states, namely, antiferromagnetic insulator κ-(ET-d8)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, paramagnetic metal α-(ET)2KHg(SCN)4, and superconductors κ-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2 and κ -(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br, where ET denotes BEDT-TTF or bisethylenedithio-tetrathiafulvalene. In all the spectra, the photoemission intensity is suppressed near the Fermi level (EF), especially for the κ-phase salts, although we have clearly observed a finite EF intensity for α-(ET)2KHg(SCN)4. Hartree-Fock band-structure calculations for the paramagnetic metallic and antiferromagnetic insulating states qualitatively explain the spectra of α-(ET)2KHg(SCN)4 and κ-(ET-d8)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, respectively, while those of κ-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2 and κ-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br strongly deviate from the calculations for the corresponding ground states. These observations imply that, among the metallic compounds, electrons are more strongly correlated in the κ-phase salts than in α-(ET)2KHg(SCN)4. It is shown that long-range electron correlation is quite important to explain the strong deviation of the spectra from the band-structure calculation. The spectra of the κ-phase salts exhibit a remarkable similarity between the metallic (superconducting) and insulating phases across the chemical pressure-induced phase transition. We have also observed unusual temperature dependence of the spectra for κ-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2, α-(ET)2KHg(SCN)4, and κ-(ET-d8)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| κ-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| κ-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| κ-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dependence of the superconducting transition temperature of organic molecular crystals on intrinsically nonmagnetic disorder: A signature of either unconventional superconductivity or the atypical formation of magnetic moments
similarity 0.95B. J. Powell & Ross H. McKenzie
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Raman studies of BEDT-TTF molecule-based organic superconductors
similarity 0.95Y. Lin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photomolecular High-Temperature Superconductivity
similarity 0.95M. Buzzi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron states and electron-phonon coupling in the BEDT-TTF-based organic superconductors
similarity 0.95J. Shumway et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Diagram for Light-Induced Superconductivity in κ−(ET)2−X
similarity 0.95M. Buzzi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local-charge-density transfer and organic superconductivity: A positron study
similarity 0.95Y. Lou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified