← Back to search

Breakdown of Migdal’s theorem and intensity of electron-phonon coupling in high-Tc superconductors

G. A. Ummarino, R. S. Gonnelli

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.R14279 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In this article we quantify the possible effects of the breakdown of Migdal’s theorem on the electron-phonon coupling constant λ, on the critical temperature Tc, and on the superconducting gap Δ by examining different kinds of superconducting materials either with low or high critical temperature. We use the theoretical approach developed by Pietronero and co-workers [Phys. Rev. B 52, 10 516 (1995); 52, 10 530 (1995)] on experimental data taken both from literature and from our recent break-junction tunneling experiments in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x. The results show that a large violation of Migdal’s theorem (as in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x) yields a large increase of λ and, to a first approximation, a large but different increase of Tc and Δ. The same theory gives no modifications when applied to low-Tc conventional superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

93Pressure not reportedunknown
Ba1-xKxBiO3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

24.5Pressure not reportedunknown
La

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.04Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.11Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers