Predicted properties of Nd1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 and related high-temperature superconductors
Howard A. Blackstead, John D. Dow
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.10798 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The charge-reservoir oxygen model of superconductivity predicts a critical temperature of Tc≈30K for R1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2MO10 (R222M−10) (with R=Eu, Sm, and Nd, and M=Ta and Nb), in agreement with the measured values ≈28 K. The model also successfully predicts RBa2Cu2MO8 (R122M−8) to be an insulator. Other predictions for R222M−10 in need of testing are (i) it is a p-type superconductor; (ii) the superconductivity originates primarily in the Sr-O layers, not in the cuprate-planes; (iii) on cuprate-plane Cu sites, of order ∼1% Ni should depress Tc to zero, while about six times as much Zn will be required to destroy superconductivity; (iv) magnetic impurities on Cu sites and Sr sites, but not rare-earth sites, will break Cooper pairs; (v) Pr on Sr sites will suppress Tc; (vi) the failure of Pr1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2MO10 to superconduct is due to the antistructure defect (PrSr+3,SrPr+2); (vii) Tc is small because the primary superconducting condensate in the charge-reservoir Sr-O layers is only ≈2 Å from the cuprate-planes; and (viii) the superconductivity should disappear with heavy Ce doping (z→1) in R2−zCezSr2Cu2MO10. The relationships of R222M−10 to R122M−8, RBa2Cu3O7, and R2−zCezCuO4 are discussed.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Eu1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sm1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Gd1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 28 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Eu1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Tm1.85Ca0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic properties of polycrystalline R1.5Ce0.5Sr2Cu2NbO10 (R=Eu, Nd, and Sm) high-Tc superconducting ceramics
similarity 0.96M. Bennahmias et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoupling and depinning of flux lattices in disordered layered superconductors
similarity 0.95Baruch Horovitz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of the valence of Pr in (Eu1.5−xPrxCe0.5)Sr2Cu2NbO10 superconducting compounds by electron-energy-loss spectroscopy
similarity 0.95S. C. Cheng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Ce doping on the Cu charge in the electron superconductor Nd2−xCexCuO4
similarity 0.95E. E. Alp et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is Nd 2−xCe xCuO4 a High-Temperature Superconductor?
similarity 0.95B. Stadlober et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prediction of superconductivity in Am2−zCezCuO4
similarity 0.95Howard A. Blackstead & John D. Dow
Source status unknown — claims are unverified