Shapes of flux domains in the intermediate state of type-I superconductors
Alan T. Dorsey, Raymond E. Goldstein
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.3058 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the intermediate state of a thin type-I superconductor magnetic flux penetrates in a disordered set of highly branched and fingered macroscopic domains. To understand these shapes, we study in detail a recently proposed “current-loop” model [R. E. Goldstein, D. P. Jackson, and A. T. Dorsey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3818 (1996)] that models the intermediate state as a collection of tense current ribbons flowing along the superconducting-normal interfaces and subject to the constraint of global flux conservation. The validity of this model is tested through a detailed reanalysis of Landau’s original conformal mapping treatment of the laminar state, in which the superconductor-normal interfaces are flared within the slab, and of a closely related straight-lamina model. A simplified dynamical model is described that elucidates the nature of possible shape instabilities of flux stripes and stripe arrays, and numerical studies of the highly nonlinear regime of those instabilities demonstrate patterns like those seen experimentally. Of particular interest is the buckling instability commonly seen in the intermediate state. The free-boundary approach further allows for a calculation of the elastic properties of the laminar state, which closely resembles that of smectic liquid crystals. We suggest several experiments to explore flux domain shape instabilities, including an Eckhaus instability induced by changing the out-of-plane magnetic field and an analog of the Helfrich-Hurault instability of smectics induced by an in-plane field.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamics of vortex penetration, jumpwise instabilities, and nonlinear surface resistance of type-II superconductors in strong rf fields
similarity 0.94A. Gurevich & G. Ciovati
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge expulsion and electric field in superconductors
similarity 0.93J. E. Hirsch
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dependence of some electromagnetic properties of superconductors on coupling strength
similarity 0.93F. Marsiglio et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory for inelastic neutron scattering in orthorhombic high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.93Andreas P. Schnyder et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic Study of Energy Dissipation in Adiabatic Superconductor Logic
similarity 0.93Naoki Takeuchi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Double peaks in the dissipation of vibrating superconductors
similarity 0.93Ernst Helmut Brandt
Source status unknown — claims are unverified