Chemical bonding between host and guest in the (HgBr2)0.5Bi2Sr1.5−xLaxCa1.5Cu2Oy (x=0.0, 0.2, and 0.4) superconducting-insulating nanocomposite system
Seong-Ju Hwang, Seung-Joo Kim, Jin-Ho Choy
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.3156 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
X-ray-absorption spectroscopic studies have been systematically carried out for the La-substituted Bi2Sr1.5−xLaxCa1.5Cu2Oy (x=0.0, 0.2, and 0.4) compounds and their HgBr2 intercalates in order to characterize the variation of the chemical bonding nature of host and guest upon substitution and intercalation reactions. According to the Cu K-edge x-ray-absorption near-edge structure-extended x-ray-absorption fine-structure analyses, it is found that the oxidation state of the CuO2 layers is reduced by substituting the Sr+II ion with La+III, while it is enhanced by the intercalation of HgBr2. Such findings provide clear evidence of the main role of charge transfer in determining the Tc of the intercalate. The chemical bonding between host lattice and intercalant layer has also been investigated by performing the Br K-edge and Hg LIII-edge x-ray-absorption spectroscopic analyses, indicating that a small fraction of electrons are transferred from host to guest and that the bond strength of Hg-Br as well as of Br-Bi is changed as the La-substitution rate increases. These results underline that the local substitution of La+III ions into the SrO plane gives rise to the overall changes for all the chemical bonds in these superconducting lattices and clarify that the competing bond model can be effectively applied to the chemically substituted superconducting oxides.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr1.5-xLaxCa1.5Cu2Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Heterostructured high-Tc superconducting nanohybrid: (Me3S)2HgI4−Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy
similarity 0.93Soon-Jae Kwon et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Simulation and study of the percolation effect in the magnetic susceptibility of high-temperature superconducting composites
similarity 0.91E. Bruneel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ac-susceptibility study of the 110-K superconducting phase of Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O
similarity 0.91S. Ravi & V. Seshu Bai
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Static vacancies in antiferromagnetic La2CuO4 and superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.90Gang Xiao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Aspects of normal-state resistivity of the cuprate superconductors Bi2Sr2CuO6+x,Tl2Ba2CuO6+x, and HgBa2CuO4+x
similarity 0.89Samantha Shears et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong thermal fluctuations in cuprate superconductors in magnetic fields above Tc
similarity 0.88Xujiang Jiang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified