← Back to search

Analysis of 13C−NMR spectra in C60 superconductors: Hyperfine coupling constants, electronic correlation effect, and magnetic penetration depth

N. Sato, H. Tou, Y. Maniwa, K. Kikuchi, S. Suzuki, Y. Achiba, M. Kosaka, K. Tanigaki

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.12433 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A 13C−NMR anisotropic hyperfine coupling tensor was determined as 2π(−1.68,−1.68,3.37)×106rad/sec for C603− in A3C60 superconductors, where A is an alkali metal, by analyzing 13C−NMR spectra below 85 K. Combined with an isotropic coupling constant of (2π×0.69)×106rad/sec, the 2s and 2p characters of the electronic wave functions at the Fermi level were deduced. The results were compatible with local-density-approximation band calculations. From a simulation of 13C−NMR spectra at superconducting state, the traceless chemical (orbital) shift tensor and isotropic chemical shift were determined as (67, 34, -101) ppm and ∼150 ppm, respectively. An estimated magnetic penetration depth is larger than 570 nm in K3C60. Furthermore, the modified Korringa relation, T1TK2∼βS (with Knight shift K, spin-lattice relaxation time T1, and Korringa constant S), clearly showed the existence of weak but substantial antiferromagnetic spin fluctuation in A3C60; β=0.40–0.58 with an error of ±20%. The Stoner enhancement factor was also determined as 1–1.5 from a comparison between spin susceptibility obtained from NMR and band-calculation results.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
K3C60

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

19Pressure not reportedonset
Rb3C60

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29.5Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers