Superconducting phases in the presence of Coulomb interaction: From weak to strong correlations
Tadeusz Domański, Karol I. Wysokiński
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.173 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the evolution of the superconducting phases in a model with competing short-range attractive (W) and on-site repulsive (U) interactions. The influence of the correlations on the phase diagram of s− and d-wave superconductors is studied by means of various approximations. The knowledge of the normal state correlation effects allows the tracking of the influence of U on the superconductivity in correlated systems. We have found the qualitatively different response of the superconducting phases in systems with W<Ucr, when the system ceases to superconduct for large enough U, and in the limit of strong W>Ucr, when the system remains superconducting for arbitrarily large U.
Similar papers
Phase-dependent noise correlations in normal-superconducting structures
similarity 0.90Markku P. V. Stenberg et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Giant Mesoscopic Fluctuations and Long-Range Superconducting Correlations in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Structures
similarity 0.90A. S. Mel’nikov & A. I. Buzdin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting fluctuations and charge-4e plaquette state at strong coupling
similarity 0.89Qiong Qin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of domain-wall superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnet bilayers
similarity 0.89M. Houzet & A. I. Buzdin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in an exactly solvable Hubbard model with bond-charge interaction
similarity 0.89Andreas Schadschneider
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of antiferromagnetic short-range order with doping in high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.89A. Yu. Zavidonov & D. Brinkmann
Source status unknown — claims are unverified