Interplay between superconductivity and flux phase in the t−J model
E. Cappelluti, R. Zeyher
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.6475 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the phase diagram of the t−J model using a mean field type approximation within the Baym-Kadanoff perturbation expansion for Hubbard X operators. The line separating the normal state from a d-wave flux or bond-order state starts near optimal doping at T=0 and rises quickly with decreasing doping. The transition temperature Tc for d-wave superconductivity increases monotonically in the overdoped region towards optimal doping. Near optimal doping a strong competition between the two d-wave order parameters sets in leading to a strong suppression of Tc in the underdoped region. Treating for simplicity the flux phase as commensurate the superconducting and flux phases coexist in the underdoped region below Tc, whereas a pure flux phase exists above Tc with a pseudogap of d-wave symmetry in the excitation spectrum. We also find that incommensurate charge-density-wave ground states due to Coulomb interactions do not modify strongly the above phase diagram near the superconducting phase, at least, as long as the latter exists at all.
Similar papers
Interplay between superconductivity and flux phase in the t-J model
similarity 0.92E. Cappelluti & R. Zeyher · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9808201
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting ground states of the extended t−J model
similarity 0.92L. G. Sarasua
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Temperature Superconductivity in the 2D t-J Model at Metal-Insulator Transition: Variational Mean Field Results
similarity 0.91Ken Cappon · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9806035
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic approach to high-temperature superconductors: Superconducting phase
similarity 0.90S. Sykora & K. W. Becker · 2009 · arXiv:0903.0925
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum fluctuations, pseudogap, and the T=0 superfluid density in strongly correlated d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90Igor F. Herbut · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0403095
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The cuprate phase diagram and the influence of nanoscale inhomogeneities
similarity 0.90Nader Zaki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.01558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified