Reply to “Comment on ‘Electrical transport in junctions between unconventional superconductors: Application of the Green’s-function formalism’ ”
Manoj P. Samanta, Supriyo Datta
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.12519 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The current-voltage characteristics of tunneling junctions involving high-Tc superconductors depend on a number of factors. Surface bound states with nonzero energy is just one such factor, which can be readily included within our model as we discussed in an earlier publication. However, this factor was not addressed in our recent publication in order to focus on other factors such as strong coupling which we believe have not received adequate attention.
Similar papers
Comment on “Electrical transport in junctions between unconventional superconductors: Application of the Green’s-function formalism”
similarity 0.92Yu. S. Barash & A. A. Svidzinsky
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to "Comment on 'Apical charge flux-modulated in-plane transport properties of cuprate superconductors'"
similarity 0.86Xin Li et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.03992
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Inner-Gap Structure in Transport Characteristics of Superconducting Junctions with Degraded Interfaces
similarity 0.86E. Zhitlukhina et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1608.03187
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle energies for a two-band interlayer-coupling model of a high-Tc superconductor
similarity 0.86W. A. Raine & W. N. Mathews, Jr.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-polarized tunneling in ferromagnet/unconventional superconductor junctions
similarity 0.86Igor Žutić & Oriol T. Valls
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermodynamic properties of low-Tc and high-Tc superconducting barrier junction (S-S’-S system) in a magnetic field
similarity 0.85Antonio Barone et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified