Model for a Josephson junction array coupled to a resonant cavity
J. Kent Harbaugh, D. Stroud
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14765 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We describe a simple Hamiltonian for an underdamped Josephson array coupled to a single photon mode in a resonant cavity. Using a Hartree-like mean-field theory, we show that, for any given strength of coupling between the photon field and the Josephson junctions, there is a transition from incoherence to coherence as a function of N, the number of Josephson junctions in the array. Above that value of N, the energy in the photon field is proportional to N2, suggestive of coherent emission. These features remain even when the junction parameters have some random variation from junction to junction, as expected in a real array. Both of these features agree with recent experiments by Barbara and co-workers.
Similar papers
Coherence Transition of Small Josephson Junctions Coupled to a Single-Mode Resonant Cavity: Connection to the Dicke Model
similarity 0.92Kohjiro Kobayashi & David Stroud · 2008 · arXiv:0806.3550
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of Two-Dimensional Josephson Arrays in a Resonant Cavity
similarity 0.91E. Almaas & D. Stroud · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207629
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theory of two-dimensional Josephson arrays in a resonant cavity
similarity 0.90E. Almaas & D. Stroud
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Model for a Josephson junction array coupled to a resonant cavity
similarity 0.90J. Kent Harbaugh & D. Stroud · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9909380
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stimulated Emission and Amplification in Josephson Junction Arrays
similarity 0.90P. Barbara et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Several small Josephson junctions in a resonant cavity: Deviation from the Dicke model
similarity 0.89W. A. Al-Saidi & D. Stroud
Source status unknown — claims are unverified