← Back to search

Combinative energy between two structural blocks and its correlation with superconductivity in Bi and Hg superconducting systems

H. Zhang, L. L. Cheng, X. C. Qin, Y. Zhao

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1618 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The influence of the interaction between two structural blocks on superconductivity was studied by calculating the cohesive energy in Bi-system superconductors, Bi2Sr2CuOy (2201), Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy (2212), and the Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3Oy (2223) phases, and Hg-system superconductors, HgBa2CuOy (1201), HgBa2CaCu2Oy (1212), HgBa2Ca2Cu3Oy (1223), HgBa2Ca3Cu4Oy (1234), and HgBa2Ca4Cu5Oy (1245), respectively. We developed a program to calculate the combinative energy between Cu-O planes and remaining parts, and between blocks in the superconductors. The result indicates that if we consider the cell as two blocks combined together, a close relationship among the combinative energy between the two blocks, the value of Tc, and the number of the Cu-O planes in the Bi- and Hg-system superconductors is established. The result gives an interesting way to understand the change of the value of Tc as the number of the Cu-O planes. In contrast, the combinative energy between the Cu-O planes and the remains obtained from the method separating all the Cu-O planes from the cell and leaving some discrete remaining parts does not show any relationship with the value of Tc. This means that considering the cell as the two blocks is more reasonable, and the interaction between the two blocks plays an important role in superconductivity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CuOy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

80Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

110Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CuOy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

94Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2CaCu2Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

128Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2Ca2Cu3Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

133Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2Ca3Cu4Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

123Pressure not reportedunknown
HgBa2Ca4Cu5Oy

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

110Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers