Bose glass scaling for superconducting vortex arrays revisited
David R. Nelson, V. M. Vinokur
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.5917 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Lidmar and Wallin have recently pointed out that Bose glass scaling theory predicts a linear cusp in the phase boundary of vortex matter with correlated disorder as a function temperature of temperature and perpendicular magnetic field. Here, we collect a number of consequences of this observation for physical quantities near the Bose glass transition.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBCO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Scaling of the Quasiparticle Spectrum for d-wave Superconductors
similarity 0.95Steven H. Simon & Patrick A. Lee
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex state and dynamics of a d-wave superconductor: Finite-element analysis
similarity 0.95Z. D. Wang & Qiang-Hua Wang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical analysis of the transport critical-state ac loss in arrays of superconducting rectangular strips
similarity 0.94Enric Pardo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical dynamics of thermal conductivity at the normal-superconducting transition
similarity 0.94Smitha Vishveshwara & Matthew P. A. Fisher
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical properties of high-temperature-superconductor granular bridge junctions: Inhomogeneous Josephson-junction-array model
similarity 0.93Jinhyoung Lee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherently coupling distinct spin ensembles through a high-Tc superconducting resonator
similarity 0.93A. Ghirri et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified