← Back to search

Comparison of Josephson fluxon modes in high- and low-temperature superconducting stacked Josephson junctions

V. M. Krasnov, V. A. Oboznov, V. V. Ryazanov, N. Mros, A. Yurgens, D. Winkler

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.766 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We experimentally study and compare the perpendicular (c-axis) transport properties of layered high-Tc superconductor (HTSC) Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x and low-Tc (LTSC) Nb/Cu multilayers. Both for HTSC and LTSC samples similar anomalous features were observed. (i) The c-axis critical current Ic is multiple valued as a function of temperature T and in-plane magnetic field H. (ii) Ic exhibits extremely large fluctuations and the probability distribution P(Ic) has multiple maxima. (iii) The Ic(H) patterns are aperiodic. (iv) In the dynamic state, the flux-flow branches in current-voltage characteristics consist of multiple closely spaced sub-branches and exhibit large fluctuations due to switching between the sub-branches. Experimental data are in qualitative agreement with numerical simulations for the stack of long strongly coupled Josephson junctions. All this is taken as an evidence for the existence of multiple quasiequilibrium Josephson fluxon modes in our samples. From the study of LTSC multilayers we have found one-to-one correspondence between the anomalous behavior and appearance of stacked Josephson junctions in the two-dimensional state.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Nb/Cu

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers