Magnetic flux distribution in a three-dimensional inductive network of Josephson junctions
A. Tuohimaa, J. Paasi, T. Tarhasaari, T. Di Matteo, R. De Luca
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.9711 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic response of three-dimensional Josephson junction networks to constant or slowly varying external magnetic fields is studied. General equations are written for complex networks made of n elementary cubic cells, each cell containing 12 resistively shunted ideal Josephson junctions. The magnetic-flux distribution in the network is calculated numerically as a function of the external magnetic field for different values of superconducting quantum interference device parameter, network size, and external magnetic-field direction. The magnetic-flux distribution in the network is graphically shown, first for increasing and then for decreasing values of the external magnetic flux.
Similar papers
Flux-flow phenomena and current-voltage characteristics of Josephson-junction arrays with inductances
similarity 0.91D. Reinel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inhomogeneous magnetic flux focusing in superconducting Josephson networks
similarity 0.88Gaia Grimaldi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin currents in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87Klaus Halterman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic-field dependence of the critical current in long Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87S. Pagano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic electromagnetic response of three-dimensional Josephson junction arrays
similarity 0.87J. Oppenlaender et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9907105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of Spin Transport in Voltage-Biased Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.86Erhai Zhao & J. A. Sauls
Source status unknown — claims are unverified