Reversible magnetization and superconducting-state thermodynamic parameters for underdoped La1.90Sr0.10CuO4
Yung M. Huh, J. E. Ostenson, F. Borsa, V. G. Kogan, D. K. Finnemore, A. Vietkin, A. Revcolevschi, M.-H. Julien
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.064512 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Magnetization studies have been made of single-crystal La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 with H‖c in order to determine the magnitude of the flux expulsion and free energy in a material that has substantially less than optimal doping. Well above the superconducting transition temperature, the normal-state magnetization exhibits a two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnetic behavior. Below Tc, there is a large portion of the H−T plane where the sample shows reversible behavior so that thermodynamic variables such as the free energy and the shape of the magnetization curves can be determined. At low temperature, the vortices have a well defined Abrikosov regime that transforms to two-dimensional fluctuation behavior at higher temperatures. The magnetization vs temperature curves show a unique crossing point at 22 K where the magnetization is independent of magnetic field. From this value of the crossing point, the effective layer spacing s is derived to be 1.6 nm compared to the CuO2 lattice spacing of 0.66 nm. The fluctuations are found to obey two-dimensional scaling in that M/(TH)1/2 is a universal function of [T−Tc(H)]/(TH)1/2. Below 12 K, the data fit the Hao-Clem theory rather well and give κc values of about 175 and thermodynamic critical fields ranging from 112 mT at 12 K to 133 mT at 6 K.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.90Sr0.10CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 88.3 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| La1.45Nd0.40Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.92Sr0.08CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic properties and superconducting-fluctuation diamagnetism above Tc in Bi2−xPbxSr2CaCu2O8+δ (x=0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5) and Bi2−xPbxSr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ (x=0.2, 0.25)
similarity 0.96W. C. Lee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Static and dynamic spin fluctuations in superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.96R. J. Birgeneau et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural and Tc inhomogeneities inherent to doping in La2−xSrxCuO4 superconductors and their effects on the precursor diamagnetism
similarity 0.96Jesús Mosqueira et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuation of vortices in single-crystal Tl2Ba2CuO6 superconductors
similarity 0.96F. Zuo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ single crystals doped with Fe, Ni, and Zn
similarity 0.95B. vom Hedt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Fluctuations in Overdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ
similarity 0.95Yu He et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified