Influence of spin fluctuations on the superconducting transition temperature and resistivity in the t-J model at large N
A. Greco, R. Zeyher
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.064520 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Spin fluctuations enter the calculation of the superconducting transition temperature Tc only in the next-to-leading order [i.e., in O(1/N2)] of the 1/N expansion of the t−J model. We have calculated these terms and show that they have only little influence on the value for Tc obtained in the leading order O(1/N) in the optimal and overdoped region, i.e., for dopings larger than the instability towards a flux phase. This result disagrees with recent spin-fluctuation mediated pairing theories. The discrepancies can be traced back to the fact that in our case the coupling between electrons and spins is determined by the t−J model and not adjusted and that the spin susceptibility is rather broad and structureless and not strongly peaked at low energies as in spin-fluctuation models. Relating Tc and transport we show that the effective interactions in the particle-particle and particle-hole channels are not simply related within the 1/N expansion by different Fermi surface averages of the same interaction as in the case of phonons or spin fluctuations. As a result, we find that large values for Tc and rather small scattering rates in the normal state as found in the experiments can easily be reconciled with each other. We also show that correlation effects heavily suppress transport relaxation rates relative to quasiparticle relaxation rates in the case of phonons but not in the case of spin fluctuations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Scaling of the superfluid density in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.96C. C. Homes et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of spin fluctuations on the superconducting transition temperature and resistivity in the t-J model at large N
similarity 0.95A. Greco & R. Zeyher · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0011255
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of proximity to an electronic topological transition on normal-state transport properties of the high−Tc superconductors
similarity 0.95G. G. N. Angilella et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting fluctuation effects on the electron spin susceptibility in YBa2Cu3O6.95
similarity 0.95H. N. Bachman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Total Suppression of Superconductivity by High Magnetic Fields in YBa2Cu3O6.6
similarity 0.95F. Rullier-Albenque et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Fluctuation Effects on the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Rate in YBa2Cu3O6.95
similarity 0.94V. F. Mitrović et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified