Tunneling through an Anderson impurity between superconductors
Yshai Avishai, Anatoly Golub, Andrei D. Zaikin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.134515 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider an Anderson impurity (A) weakly connected to a superconducting electrode (S) on one side and a superconducting or a normal-metal electrode (N) on the other side. A general path-integral formalism is developed and the response of SAN and SAS junctions to a constant voltage bias V is elucidated, using a combination of the Keldysh technique (to handle nonequilibrium effects) and a dynamical mean-field approximation (to handle repulsive Hubbard interactions). An interesting physics is exposed at subgap voltages (eV<Δ for SAN and eV<2Δ for SAS). For an SAN junction, Andreev reflection is strongly affected by Coulomb interaction. For superconductors with p-wave symmetry the junction conductance exhibits a remarkable peak at eV<Δ, while for superconductors with s-wave symmetric pair potential the peak is shifted towards the gap edge eV=Δ and strongly suppressed if the Hubbard repulsive interaction increases. Electron transport in SAS junctions is determined by an interplay between multiple Andreev reflection (MAR) and Coulomb effects. For s-wave superconductors the usual peaks in the conductance that originate from MAR are shifted by interaction to larger values of V. They are also suppressed as the Hubbard interaction strength grows. For p-wave superconductors the subgap current is much larger and the I−V characteristics reveal an interesting feature, namely, a peak in the current resulting from a midgap bound state in the junction.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Josephson current in unconventional superconductors through an Anderson impurity
similarity 0.96Y. Avishai & A. Golub
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Domain walls in superconductors: Andreev bound states and tunneling features
similarity 0.95S. P. Mukherjee & K. V. Samokhin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev bound states and tunneling characteristics of a noncentrosymmetric superconductor
similarity 0.95C. Iniotakis et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Point-Contact Tunneling Involving Low-Dimensional Spin-Triplet Superconductors
similarity 0.94C. J. Bolech & T. Giamarchi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity and interface bound states in dx2−y2+idxy and px+ipy superconductors
similarity 0.94Qiang-Hua Wang & Z. D. Wang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum interference between nonmagnetic impurities in dx2−y2-wave superconductors
similarity 0.94Dirk K. Morr & Nikolaos A. Stavropoulos
Source status unknown — claims are unverified