Reply to “Comment on ‘Time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductivity’ ”
Haranath Ghosh
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.226502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In the context of broken time-reversal states of d-wave superconductors, Adhikari disputes the use of the BCS gap equation for dx2−y2+eiθdxy superconductors for the case of θ=0 in Haranath Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B 59, 3357 (1999). We emphasize in this reply that such a conclusion is based on unphysical arguments. The results of Haranath Ghosh and conclusions are correct and to the point.
Similar papers
Comment on "Time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductivity"
similarity 0.89Sadhan K. Adhikari · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105539
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ``BCS to Bose-Einstein crossover phase diagram at zero temperature for a d_{x^2-y^2} order parameter superconductor: Dependence on the tight-binding structure''
similarity 0.84A. Perali et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0211132
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Self-consistent electronic structure of a and a vortex
similarity 0.83M. Franz & Z. Tešanović · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9710258
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle focusing of bound states in two-dimensional -wave superconductors
similarity 0.81Mateo Uldemolins et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.01750
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-Energy Subgap States and the Magnetic Flux Periodicity in d-Wave Superconducting Rings
similarity 0.81Yu. S. Barash
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gauge invariance, collective modes, and the justification of normal-state subtraction in Dirac superconductors
similarity 0.81Hiroshi Hayasaka · 2026 · arXiv:2608.28485
Source status unknown — claims are unverified