Raman transport and magnetization study of the RuSr2R2−xCexCu2O10+δ (R=Gd,Eu) high-temperature superconducting cuprates
G. V. M. Williams, M. Ryan
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.094515 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present the results from a Raman transport and magnetization study on RuSr2R2−xCexCu2O10+δ. This compound has been shown to exhibit the coexistence of superconducting and magnetic order. Unlike the other superconducting ruthenate cuprate, RuSr2RCu2O8, RuSr2R2−xCexCu2O10+δ contains a significant ferromagnetic component. We find that the peak in the low-field zero-field-cooled magnetization data increases with increasing Ce concentration. This increase is mirrored by an increase in the saturation magnetization at 9.5 kG. However, there is no direct correlation between these increases and the superconducting transition temperature. Furthermore, there are no well-defined changes in either the resistance or the thermopower data that can be correlated with the magnetic-ordering transition. A simple explanation for the increase in the saturation magnetization at 9.5 kG is that, similar to SrRuO3, the RuO2 layers in RuSr2R2−xCexCu2O10+δ are itinerant ferromagnetic metals. We show that the RuSr2R2−xCexCu2O10+δ transport data can be interpreted in terms of both the resistance and thermopower being dominated by the CuO2 layers. In this interpretation, the RuO2 layers only affect the resistance in the CuO2 layers via exchange coupling and possible spin scattering. The Raman spectra is essentially the same as that found in RuSr2RCu2Oδ and there is no evidence of Raman modes that can be associated with the R2−xCexO2 substructure.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2Gd2-xCexCu2O10+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2Gd1.6Ce0.4Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2Gd1.4Ce0.6Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2Gd1.4Ce0.6Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| RuSr2Eu1.4Ce0.6Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 49 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2Eu1.4Ce0.6Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| RuSr2GdCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 45 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| RuSr2EuCu2O8 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NbSr2Eu1.4Ce0.6Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 20 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| NbSr2Eu1.4Ce0.6Cu2O10 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Charge and spin states of Ru and Cu in magnetic superconductor RuSr2GdCu2O8 studied by NMR
similarity 0.95Ken-ichi Kumagai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure dependence of superconducting and magnetic critical temperatures in the ruthenocuprates
similarity 0.95R. Citro et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic and superconducting properties of RuSr2Gd1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10−δ samples: Dependence on the oxygen content and aging effects
similarity 0.94C. A. Cardoso et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetotransport study of intra- and intergrain transitions in the magnetic superconductors RuSr2GdCu2O8 and RuSr2(Gd1.5Ce0.5)Cu2O10
similarity 0.94S. García et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-dimensional frustrated magnetic state in superconducting RuSr2Eu1.5Ce0.5Cu2O10
similarity 0.94S. Garcia et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Ru1−xSr2GdCu2+xO8−y compounds
similarity 0.94P. W. Klamut et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified