Local-moment formation in the periodic Anderson model with superconducting correlations
M. A. N. Araújo, N. M. R. Peres, P. D. Sacramento
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.012503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study local-moment formation in the presence of superconducting correlations among the f electrons in the periodic Anderson model. Local moments form if the Coulomb interaction U>Ucr. We find that Ucr is considerably stronger in the presence of superconducting correlations than in the nonsuperconducting system. Our study is done for various values of the f-level energy and electronic density. The smallest critical Ucr values occur for the case where the number of f electrons per site is equal to 1. In the presence of d-wave superconducting correlations we find that local-moment formation presents a quantum phase transition as function of pressure. This quantum phase transition separates a region where local moments and d-wave superconductivity coexist from another region characterized by a superconducting ground state with no local moments. We discuss the possible relevance of these results to experimental studies of the competition between magnetic order and superconductivity in CeCu2Si2.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeCu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| U0.97Th0.03Be13 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UPd2Al3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UNi2Al3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Charge fluctuations, spin fluctuations, and superconductivity in the Anderson lattice model of heavy-fermion systems
similarity 0.96A. Houghton et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
d-wave superconductivity in the frustrated two-dimensional periodic Anderson model
similarity 0.96Wei Wu & A.-M.-S. Tremblay
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlation-driven d-wave superconductivity in Anderson lattice model: Two gaps
similarity 0.95Marcin M. Wysokiński et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exchange-correlation effects in magnetic-field-induced superconductivity
similarity 0.94Klaus Capelle
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting states of reduced symmetry: General order parameters and physical implications
similarity 0.94Sungkit Yip & Anupam Garg
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiclassical theory of superconductivity near magnetically active interfaces
similarity 0.94A. Millis et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified