← Back to search

Arguments and evidence for a node-containing anisotropic s-wave gap form in the cuprate superconductors

B. H. Brandow

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.054503 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Although not widely recognized, there is much evidence suggesting that the superconducting cuprates have an anisotropic s-wave type of gap form, a form which is usually so highly anisotropic that it contains gap nodes and regions of opposite sign. This evidence is presented and reviewed. This evidence motivates a search for s-wave explanations of the many experiments which seem to require the d-wave gap form. s- wave explanations are presented here for three of the phase-sensitive Josephson tunnelling experiments, experiments which are widely regarded as some of the most convincing evidence for the x2−y2 d-wave gap form. A key feature in all of these explanations is orthorhombicity. Although the evidence and reinterpretations of phase-sensitive experiments clearly improve the credibility of the anisotropic-s gap form, some important issues are still unsettled and the question of the gap form remains open. An experimental test is proposed.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Tl2Ba2CuO6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Ba2CaCu2O8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers