← Back to search

Surface barrier in mesoscopic type-I and type-II superconductors

Alexander D. Hernández, Daniel Domínguez

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144529 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We study the surface barrier for magnetic-field penetration in mesoscopic samples of both type-I and type-II superconductors. Our results are obtained from numerical simulations of the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations. We calculate the dependence of the first field for flux penetration (Hp) with the Ginzburg-Landau parameter (κ) observing an increase of Hp with decreasing κ for a superconductor-insulator boundary condition [(∇−iA)Ψ|n=0] while for a superconductor-normal boundary condition (approximated by the limiting case of Ψ|S=0) Hp has a smaller value independent of κ and proportional to Hc. We study the magnetization curves and penetration fields at different sample sizes and for square and thin-film geometries. For small mesoscopic samples we study the peaks and discontinuous jumps found in the magnetization as a function of magnetic field. To interpret these jumps we consider that vortices located inside the sample induce a reinforcement of the surface barrier at fields greater than the first penetration field Hp1. This leads to multiple penetration fields Hpi=Hp1,Hp2,Hp3,… for vortex entrance in mesoscopic samples. We study the dependence on sample size of the penetration fields Hpi. We explain these multiple penetration fields, extending the usual Bean-Livingston analysis by considering the effect of vortices inside the superconductor and the finite size of the sample.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Al

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers