Gap anisotropy, spin fluctuations, and normal-state properties of the electron-doped superconductor Sr0.9La0.1CuO2
G. V. M. Williams, R. Dupree, A. Howes, S. Krämer, H. J. Trodahl, C. U. Jung, Min-Seok Park, Sung-Ik Lee
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.224520 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report the results from a thermopower and a Cu nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study of the infinite-CuO2-layer electron-doped high-temperature superconducting cuprate (HTSC) Sr0.9La0.1CuO2. We find that the temperature dependence of the thermopower, S(T), is different from that observed in the hole-doped HTSC. In particular, we find that dS(T)/dT is positive above ∼120 K. However, we show that S(T) can still be described by the same model developed for the hole-doped HTSC and hence S(T) is not anomalous and does not imply phonon-mediated pairing as has previously been suggested. The Cu NMR data reveal a Knight shift and spin lattice relaxation rate below Tc that are inconsistent with isotropic s-wave pairing. The Cu spin lattice relaxation rate in the normal state, however, is Curie-Weiss like and is comparable to that of the optimally and overdoped hole-doped HTSC La2−xSrxCuO4. The magnitude of the Knight shift indicates that the density of states at the Fermi level is anomalously small when compared with the hole-doped HTSC with the same Tc, indicating that the size of N(Ef) is of little importance in the HTSC. We find no evidence of the normal state pseudogap that is observed in the hole-doped HTSC and which was recently reported to exist in the electron-doped HTSC Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 from infrared reflectance measurements.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr0.9La0.1CuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 44 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Sr0.9La0.1CuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 43 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr0.9Nd0.1CuO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 24 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Gap Anisotropy, Spin Fluctuations and Normal-State Properties of the Electron Doped Superconductor Sr0.9La0.1CuO2
similarity 1.00G. V. M. Williams et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0111421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin and charge excitations in artificial hole- and electron-doped infinite layer cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.96G. Dellea et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Gap-function symmetry and spin dynamics in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.96C. S. Liu & W. C. Wu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of a magnetic-field effect on static magnetic order in the electron-doped superconductor Nd1.86Ce0.14CuO4
similarity 0.96M. Matsuda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of Ce doping on the Cu charge in the electron superconductor Nd2−xCexCuO4
similarity 0.96E. E. Alp et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of a magnetic field on the long-range magnetic order in insulating Nd2CuO4 and nonsuperconducting and superconducting Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4
similarity 0.96M. Matsuura et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified