← Back to search

Gap anisotropy, spin fluctuations, and normal-state properties of the electron-doped superconductor Sr0.9La0.1CuO2

G. V. M. Williams, R. Dupree, A. Howes, S. Krämer, H. J. Trodahl, C. U. Jung, Min-Seok Park, Sung-Ik Lee

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.224520 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report the results from a thermopower and a Cu nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study of the infinite-CuO2-layer electron-doped high-temperature superconducting cuprate (HTSC) Sr0.9La0.1CuO2. We find that the temperature dependence of the thermopower, S(T), is different from that observed in the hole-doped HTSC. In particular, we find that dS(T)/dT is positive above ∼120 K. However, we show that S(T) can still be described by the same model developed for the hole-doped HTSC and hence S(T) is not anomalous and does not imply phonon-mediated pairing as has previously been suggested. The Cu NMR data reveal a Knight shift and spin lattice relaxation rate below Tc that are inconsistent with isotropic s-wave pairing. The Cu spin lattice relaxation rate in the normal state, however, is Curie-Weiss like and is comparable to that of the optimally and overdoped hole-doped HTSC La2−xSrxCuO4. The magnitude of the Knight shift indicates that the density of states at the Fermi level is anomalously small when compared with the hole-doped HTSC with the same Tc, indicating that the size of N(Ef) is of little importance in the HTSC. We find no evidence of the normal state pseudogap that is observed in the hole-doped HTSC and which was recently reported to exist in the electron-doped HTSC Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4 from infrared reflectance measurements.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr0.9La0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

44Pressure not reportedonset
Sr0.9La0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

43Pressure not reportedunknown
Sr0.9Nd0.1CuO2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

24Pressure not reportedunknown
Nd1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

25Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers